Home

- Top Fools -

Road_runner_43
09/29/00
S
[SONS ]

Road_runner_43, (SONS Post #8764):

'Why are Shorts typically sensible and level-headed with worthwhile posts while Longs are always irritating, immature, prone to lying, etc? Does anybody on this board really listen to these individuals and buy/sell their stock based on the ranting of these warts? Just curious.'

Road_Runner_43, (SONS #8740):

'I saved the big chunks for you.

Puke

BEEP BEEP'

John_Lebed
09/22/00
L
[ all ]

SEC: 'His messages moved the markets'

From his SI profile:

Occupation/Title: 'The Great One'

Favorite Stocks: 'You have to pay for this information'

Personal Quote: 'Lebed just laid the smack down on that piece of trailer park trash'

Hey guys,... Don't get ahead of me here. 15 year old John Lebed isn't our Fool of the Week, those Fools who bought shares of companies he pumped with his vapid posts, are!

John has no expertise in valuing companies. He's a spammer... obviously a good one. Note that his company, eprolutions.com (Promotion Solutions), sells bulk e-mail marketing services (SPAM), not stock picks.

I'll just quote from the news stories:

'Working up to six hours a day on a computer in his suburban New Jersey bedroom, Lebed sent out hundreds of phony postings on the Internet, extolling stocks he bought through brokerage accounts his parents began setting up for him when he was 12.'

'Because he used aliases, the SEC said, there was no way that other Internet surfers in search of a promising tip could know they were being manipulated by his exciting pronouncements. And because he used "sell limit orders," which automatically sold the stock when it reached a certain level, he often was in school when he made his biggest profits, the SEC said.'

'After buying 18,000 shares of Man Sang Holdings Inc. for $2 or less on Jan. 5, for example, he claimed in a posting on a Yahoo message board that it was "the most undervalued stock in history" and would probably soon be trading at $20. That touched off a frenzy on Jan. 6, when the volume of trading shot up from a little less than 61,000 shares to more than a million shares. The price rose to more than $4.'

'The SEC originally sought to bring charges against Lebed involving 27 trades. In settling the case, the agency focused on only 11, he said. That means Lebed can keep the profits from all the other trades the SEC was investigating, Marino said, and that "was substantially more" than the amount Lebed has agreed to pay back.'

'I'm feeling great today,' Lebed said in the telephone interview. 'I have nothing to worry about.'

Fraudexpose
09/15/00
S
ARBA

Like we intrepid researchers at Messageboardfools.com, Fraudexpose also has a life mission; to expose fraud.

Fraudexpose's theory is that ARBA is a baseless company built on fluff and deception because an insider bought HIS shares @ $.60 and is now selling them at ~ $150.

In his own words, 'ARBA is the product of a conspiracy, exposed in the media, and its just a matter of when, not if, this stock craters. Complaints to the SEC may even be helping.'

Tokyo_Yoyo
09/08/00
L
BVSN

Broadvision certainly knows how to attract attention. 35m shares traded after they issued the below press release Friday:

'BroadVision and H&Q To Host Conference Call to Announce a Groundbreaking Wireless Venture With Global Impact'

WOW! Pretty cool, huh!

Unfortunately, this is the 'correction' released the next day (Saturday evening):

'Correction: BroadVision (Nasdaq:BVSN) and H&Q Asia Pacifc to Host Conference Call to Announce A Wireless Venture'

Hmmmn. Not quite as cool...

Undeterred, Tokyo_yoyo opines (#78897) that the correction is only to avoid confusion with a supposed company called 'Global Impact'. Get it? '...Venture with Global Impact'???

Of course this doesn't explain why the hyperbolic adjective 'Groundbreaking' was changed too.

We must also use this space to bestow foolish achievement honors to Stockmeiser2000 who offered this 'Obvious Explanation' (#79011): 'The headline was altered to include additional information without lengthening the headline. The original headline was 104 characters, and the altered one is 102 characters.'

Daddies_monie
09/01/00
S
EMLX

Being a fool is not illegal, but doing illegal is being a fool. Especially $2.5b worth!

Daddies_monie left his job at InternetWire on 'good terms' Aug 18, 1 week before the hoax because implementing his now infamous hoax.

He then created his Yahoo alias on Aug 21 and promptly shorted EMLX at $72. Then he averaged up. And averaged up again. And again. And again @ $92.

After EMLX was trading @ over $113, and with tech stocks in favor again, Daddies_monie employed Plan B to recoup his (his daddies) $100k loss by playing the 'PR card'.

He used the heavy artillery: a dash of 'Earnings Restatements', a pinch of 'SEC Investigations' and a heaping teaspoon of 'CEO Resignation'... Mixed thoughly, and issued the fake PR at 6:30am EMLX time... right at market open.

'Gee, trading sure is tough not being able to gleam inside info from InternetWire. I only lasted a week trading on my own skills.'

Back
Top